For nearly forty years, Strategic Air Command's best crews have gathered to participate in the annual SAC Bombing and Navigation Competition which took the name Proud Shield in 1986. Over the years, the competition had helped build morale and sharpen the competitive edge of SAC's bomber and tanker crews. More importantly, the 'bomb comp' had served to test crew skills and equipment under exacting conditions.The Bombing and Navigation Competition had its origins in the late 1940s when America's strategic air forces were in a period of adjustment. In May 1948, SAC Deputy Commander Major General Clements McMullen instructed all bomber units to concentrate upon improving their bombing capability. He also announced that a competition would be held to reinforce this order and to focus attention on the need for improved accuracy.The FB-111A participated in its first SAC Bomb Comp in November 1970 at McCoy AFB, Florida. Two FB-111A from the 340th BG at Carswell AFB, Texas made their first showing at the competition. The FBs made a stunning debut, with one crew capturing the wing bombing trophy while the other narrowly missed winning the navigation award. The criteria for winning the Fairchild Trophy had been changed and was awarded now to the outstanding bomber unit and associated tanker squadron in the combined fields of bombing and navigation. Since the FB-111's parent organization, the 340th BG, had no collected tanker unit, it was ruled ineligible for the Fairchild. In December 1971, SAC crews from all over the United States converged on McCoy AFB for the Eighteenth Bombing and Navigation Competition. Renamed 'Giant Voice', the competition was identical to the preceding year. SAC's B-52 units swept the competition and the FB-111s did not win a single event.Because of the war in Southeast Asia, the competition did not take place in 1972 and 1973. The Bomb Comp resumed in November 1974 at Barksdale AFB, Louisiana. A turning point in the history of the competition was reached when 'Vulcan' and FB-111A broke the B-52's long monopoly over the top competition trophies. Even more significant was the performance of the 380th BMW. The 380th captured not only the Fairchild Trophy, but the crew and wing bombing trophies as well. The FB-111A's sophisticated avionics system made it especially difficult for the B-52 to compete against it.
For the next twelve years, the FB-111A did win every 'Bomb Comp' but three. Between 1974 and 1979, the 380th BW's FBs took home the Fairchild. In 1980, a B-52 Wing, the 320th, captured the Fairchild. For the next three years, 1981 to 1983, the trophy belonged to SAC's only other FB-111A wing, the 509th from Pease AFB, N.H. In 1984, the trophy passed back to the 380th. Finally, in 1985 the B-52s of the 97th Bomb Wing stationed at Blytheville, Arkansas broke the FB-111A's four years monopoly over the Fairchild.The FB-111A's long reign over the 'Bomb Comp' had two effects on the combat competition, both of which were felt almost immediately. First, in 1974 SAC revived the practice of rewarding the best performance made by each category of aircraft. SAC had stopped this practice after the B-47 was phased out in 1965. Separate awards were given out in 1974 for the best F/FB-111, B-52, KC-135 and Vulcan missions. The second effect of the FB-111A preeminence in the Fairchild competition was the development of a long standing debate over the merits of handicapping. The alterations had little effect, and in 1977 the FB-111A won every award for which it was eligible. SAC Headquarters continued to oppose the institution of any outright handicapping system. Major General Earl M.Peck, SAC Deputy Chief of Staff for Operations, noted that the current system served to highlight the FB-111A superiority. If the FB-111 units truly had the best equipment and crews, then, reasoned Peck, they deserved to win. Handicapping, on the other hand, would only make the B-52 appear equal to the FB-111A. This would have unfortunate consequences in regard to the public's perception of the FB-111. Any perception by the public that SAC's older B-52s were just as good as the more modern FB-111s would undermine the Command's efforts to further update B-52 and FB-111 systems. Given the FB-111s already controversial history, General Peck feared that allowing the B-52 to win would only perpetuate the public's impression that the FB-111A was an inferior aircraft. With these thoughts in mind, CINCSAC General Richard H.Hellis rejected Fifthteen Air Force's appeal for a handicapping system.
The 1975 Giant Voice competition was canceled and replaced by a military exercise nicknamed "Operation High Noon". Operation 'High Noon' served as a transition phase while SAC redesigned the Giant Voice competition. General Dougherty had three primary goals in reorganizing the 'Bomb Comp'. First, he sought to broaden participation in the competition in order to give all crews a feeling of participation in the 'Bomb Comp' progress. Secondly, he wanted to reduce the costs associated with the 'Bomb Comp'. Finally, General Dougherty sought to make the competition more meaningful by injecting more realism into the competition missions. As such, the reforms of 1976 reflected General Power's earlier efforts to transform the competition from a bombing tournament into a realistic test of capabilities of SAC's best bomber and tanker crews.SAC reorganized the 1976 Giant Voice Competition into three distinct phases. During the first phase (July-August), every combat ready crew in SAC (with the exception of overseas units) would be evaluated with an eye toward selecting the top three crews of each unit. The top three crews from each unit, together with one 'wild card' crew chosen by the wing commander, would represent the unit at the second or semi-final phase which was held over a three day period in late September. Each crew flew a prescribed course which was scored by the 1st Combat Evaluation Group. The two highest scoring crews from each unit would then progress to the final phase. Scores from both the semi-final and final phases would be used to determine the competition winners. Finally, a two-day symposium would be held at Barksdale AFB to announce the winners and discuss the results. This three phases structure ensured that all combat capable crews would initially have a chance to compete, while the field was gradually narrowed down to each unit's best two crews.
Beginning in 1980, the semi-final phase was eliminated and thereafter the competition consisted simply of a preliminary phase and a final competition in which the two best crews of each SAC unit competed for top honors. The elimination of the middle phase allowed SAC to increase the number of missions flown in the final phase. The most important trend in the competition since 1976 have been the growth in the size and complexity of the tournament. Over the past ten years, non-SAC units have played a role in the competition. TAC F-111s have been regular contestants since 1974, and in 1977, Air National Guard and Air Force Reserve tankers joined the competition. In 1980, Royal Australian Air Force F-111s came to participate on a biennial basis. USAFE joined the 28th 'Bomb Comp' in 1984 when it sent two F-111F.The participation of non-SAC units was less important than the steps taken to increase the level of difficulty in the competition. Electronic countermeasures became increasingly important as aircraft were required to evade and fend off "hostile" AAA and SAM defenses. In 1978, simulated launches of Short Range Attack Missiles (SRAM) were added to the competition. Each competition after 1978 included multiple simulated SRAM launches as well as the traditional high and low-level bombing. In 1979, an entirely new dimension was added when Air Defense Tactical Air Command (ADTAC) interceptors were sent to 'shoot down' the bombers during the competition. Now, SAC crews had to try and evade live opponents on their way to their appointed targets. Even greater realism was added in 1984 when SAC began to hold part of the competition over the Nellis AFB 'Red Flag' bombing range. The use of the Nellis range permitted competition aircraft to drop inert weapons for the first time in many years. It also provided a more challenging environment as bomber crews attempted to avoid a barrage of simulated anti-aircraft fire, surface-to-air missiles and NORAD interceptors.
Along with the new phases of the competition came a host of new awards. In addition to reintroducing awards for the best crew of each type of aircraft, Headquarters SAC created the General John C.Meyer Trophy in 1976.The Meyer trophy was awarded to the F/FB-111 unit with the best score in ECM and low altitude bombing. Eventually, the RAF's Tornado was eligible for this award as well. Another award which appeared in 1978 was the General Russell E.Dougherty Trophy for the best score in simulated SRAM exercises. By the mid-1980s, four additional awards were added to the list of major trophies. Two of them were the Curtis E.LeMay Trophy to the crew with the highest score in low and high-level bombardment. In 1984, the B.L.Davis Trophy was given out to the most improved unit.Over the years, the SAC Bombing and Navigation Competition had evolved from a relatively simple bombing exercise to a challenging course which had tested the all round skills of SAC crews. Ground crews have been tested too, especially after the use of spare aircraft was banned in 1953. By the mid-1980s, high and low-level bomb runs, low-level navigation and terrain following, fighter intercepts, missile defense runs and a battery of other ECM tests had been combined to provide a meaningful challenge to SAC crews.The competition was renamed "Proud Shield" in 1987 and with it came some changes. The biggest change came in crew selection. Every crew in the SAC wings got a shot to 'try out' for the competition during normal training. However, the four crews from each bomber and tanker unit who actually participated in the competition were selected by the 1st Combat Evaluation Group rather than by the unit themselves. The 1st CEG was also responsible for scoring the meet. Furthermore, the competition crews were not told that they would be participating until five days before the flights began. Another change in the Bomb Comp was that the bomber crews, upon completion of their low-level bombing runs, and even the tanker crews were required to regenerate their own aircraft. Flying crews would land at an unfamiliar base, deplane, check the oil and hydraulics, fuel the aircraft themselves and depart for their home base.Starting in 1987, four new awards were presented to the crew chiefs under the "Glossy Eagle" restoration program and the winning aircraft were displayed during the three day Bomb Comp Symposium held at Barksdale AFB in November. The Symposium was a proper forum for the close of the Bomb Comp Competition. SAC crews who participated joined their commanders, distinguished civilian visitors, SAC staff members, numbered air forces and air division officers to exchange ideas at two symposiums. One for military participants and the other for civilian guests. The Symposium was a valuable tool to exchange information and ideas to improve proficiency and better understand SAC's mission.
Evaluation of the effectiveness of SAC's crews to perform their mission belonged to the 1st Combat Evaluation Group, based at Barksdale AFB, Louisiana. Using sophisticated prepositioned ground-based equipment, the 1st CEG's technicians determined if the target was hit, or, if missed, by how much. The core of the scoring system in use was the AN/TPQ-43 Seek Score computerized radar and optical tracking system. The system plotted when the simulated bomb was released and then factors in weight, speed, trajectory, winds, altitude of the aircraft and other variables to arrive at a determination of the specific impact point.
1970- In its first competition with the FB, the 340th BG won the Wing Bombing Trophy.
1974- The 380th BMW won the competition and received the Fairchild Trophy, the Crew Bombing Trophy, the Wing Bombing Trophy and the Best Single Mission F/FB-111.
1976- The 380th BMW won its second competition and the Fairchild Trophy. A crew from the 380th also won the Best FB-111 Crew award. The 509th BMW received the Meyer Trophy.
1977- The 380th BMW won its third competition with the 509th BMW coming close second. The 380th was awarded the Fairchild Trophy, the Best Crew Bombing Trophy and the Holloway Trophy. The 509th BMW received the Meyer Trophy, the Mathis Trophy and the Best FB-111 Crew.
1978- The 380th BMW won its fourth in a row and was awarded the Fairchild Trophy and the Meyer Trophy. The 509th captured the Best Crew Bombing Trophy and the Mathis Trophy.
1979- The 509th BMW won its first competition and received the Fairchild Trophy and Best FB-111 Crew. The 380th was awarded the Best Crew Bombing Trophy, the Saunders Trophy and the Best KC-135 Crew.
1980- A B-52 won the competition but nonetheless, FB wings performed well. The 380th won the LeMay Trophy and Best FB-111 Crew. The 509th received the Meyer Trophy.
1981- The 509th BMW won its second competition with the 380th BMW being second. The 509th received the Fairchild Trophy, the LeMay Trophy, the Mathis Trophy, the Meyer Trophy. The Best FB-111 Crew was awarded to the 380th.
1982- The 509th BMW again dominated the competition and won the Fairchild Trophy, the Holloway Trophy, the Mathis Trophy, the Meyer Trophy, the Saunders Trophy and the Best KC-135 Crew. The 380th received the LeMay Trophy and the Best FB-111 Crew. Pease's 509th Bomb Wing became the first SAC unit to win five Bomb Comp trophies in the same competition. Pease crews achieved the highest competition effectiveness of .7535 to capture the coveted Fairchild trophy. Crew E-73, commanded by Maj. William C. Brooks, 380th BW won Best FB-111 while Crew S-03, commanded by Capt. Leon Casaubon, %09th BW came second.
1983- The 509th BMW won its fourth competition and received the Fairchild Trophy, the Meyer Trophy and Best FB-111 Crew.
1984- The 380th BMW won the competition and received its fifth Fairchild Trophy, the Saunders Trophy and Best FB-111 Crew.
1985- It was not a great success for the FB-111A in this competition. The 509th BMW received the Best FB-111 Crew.
1986- The 380th was awarded the Meyer Trophy and Best FB-111 Crew.
1987- The 509th BMW was awarded the Gen.Bennie L.Davis Most Improved Unit Trophy and the Best FB-111 Crew.
1988- The 509th BMW received the Meyer Trophy.
1989- The 380th BMW received the Meyer Trophy and the Mathis Trophy. The LeMay Trophy and the Best FB-111 Crew were awarded to the 509th.
(Left to right) Fairchild Trophy, Bruce K. Holloway Trophy, Mathis Trophy and the Curtiss E. LeMay Bombing Trophy
The Fairchild Trophy. Named for General Muir S.Fairchild, former USAF Vice Chief of Staff, the trophy which was donated by Hughes Aircraft Corporation was awarded to the best bomber unit in the combined fields of navigation and bombing (1951-69) and to the outstanding bomber and associated tanker unit in the combined fields of bombing and navigation (1970-89).
The Bruce K.Holloway Trophy. Originally called the Wing Navigation Trophy, the award was given to the wing with the highest score in navigation from 1951 to 1958. During the next ten years (1959-69), it was awarded to the bomber unit with the best score in navigation. The criteria changed again in 1970, and during 1970-76, the trophy was presented to either the bomber or tanker crew with the best score in navigation. Since 1977, the trophy has been given to the tanker unit with the highest score in navigation. In 1986, it was renamed in honor of General Bruce K.Holloway, former CINCSAC and USAF Vice Chief of Staff.
The Mathis Trophy. Named after 1st Lt. Jack W.Mathis, a World War II bombardier who received the Medal of Honor posthumously for bravery over Germany. The trophy was sponsored by the Air Force Association. Between 1970-74, the Mathis trophy was given to the bomber crew with the best score in bombing and navigation. Since 1976, the trophy has been used to reward the bomber unit with the best combined score in high and low level bombing.
The Curtis E.LeMay Bombing Trophy. Named for former CINCSAC General Curtis E.LeMay and donated by Norden Systems, this trophy has been awarded to the crew with the best score in high and low level bombing. First presented in 1980, the LeMay trophy replaced the earlier Best Crew Bombing Trophy.
The Meyer Trophy. Named after General John C.Meyer, former CINCSAC. The trophy was donated by the General Dynamics Corporation and has been awarded to the best F/FB-111 or Tornado unit in the competition.
The Saunders Trophy. Named after Brigadier General Donald W. Saunders, commander of the 57th Air Division, who was killed while attempting to set a world cruise record in June 1958. the Saunders trophy has been given out every year since 1960 to the tanker unit with the best score in the competition.
The B.L.Davis Most Improved Unit Trophy. Named after former CINCSAC General Bennie L.Davis, the Davis Trophy was donated by the Memphis Chamber of Commerce in 1984. The purpose of the trophy was to honor the 'most improved' unit in the competition.
The Best FB-111 Crew. The best crew award was presented to the FB-111A crew that compiled the highest percentage of possible points in the competition for all activity.
The 1975 Giant Voice competition was canceled by CINCSAC General Dougherty and replaced with a military exercise named Operation High Noon. Operation High Noon served as a transition phase while SAC redesigned the Giant Voice competition.SAC bombers, fighter-bombers and aerial refueling tankers, F-111s of Tactical Air Command and "Vulcan" bombers of the Royal Air force completed the two-day nationwide exercise to evaluate the capability of the participating units to plan and execute contingency operations with minimum preparation time. Mission objectives included evaluation of new concepts, tactics and procedures that were applicable to rapid response situations. Beside SAC units, the exercise also involved three F-111 wings from TAC and four "Vulcan" crews from the United Kingdom's RAF Strike Command, operating from Barksdale AFB, Louisiana.SAC units were notified on Saturday, September 27, 1975 to select their respective aircrews and aircraft from those which were on alert duty and to begin mission planning and preparation. The Royal Air Force and Tactical Air Command commanders also employed a random selection procedure for their crews and aircraft. Exercise missions were flown in two night segments, September 30 - October 1 and, October 1 - October 2. The Strategic Air Command normally maintained up to 30 percent of its bomber and tanker force on 24 hours ground alert; therefore, other aircrews replaced those selected to participate in this exercise and there was no alert degradation.All 21 SAC bomber and three tanker wings plus two non-collocated tanker squadrons within the continental United States were participating. Each SAC Bomb Wing flew two bombers (B-52s and FB-111s) and two KC-135 tanker aircraft while each SAC Tanker Wing and non-collocated squadrons flew two KC-135s. Each of the three TAC F-111 Fighter Wings also employed two aircraft. With the exception of the RAF, all aircraft took off from and landed at their home bases, and performed en route aerial refueling as part of the exercise. The RAF Strike Command had prepositioned four "Vulcan" bombers at Barksdale AFB and operated from there. Each aircrew flew one mission during the two days exercise. The aircraft and crew were scored on all aspects of mission reliability, including their accuracy and proficiency in navigation controlled timing, and, with the exception of the RAF, aerial refueling. The bombers and fighters were also scored on multiple low level bomb runs. No bombs were carried by these aircraft; all bombing was simulated and radar scored through aircrew transmission of electrical impulses recorded by ground based scoring (RBS) equipment, using radio and radar signals to measure the accuracy of these simulated bomb drops.
Operation High Noon gave participating commands a useful means of evaluating and determining the capabilities of their respective unit staffs, aircrews and supporting personnel to respond rapidly to potential contingency situations.SAC's 92nd Bomb Wing at Fairchild AFB, Washington, achieved the best overall results of any SAC's bomber and tanker units participating in the High Noon exercise. The Fairchild unit was the outstanding SAC unit based on its combined best scores in overall bombing and tanker operations. It also posted the best individual B-52 mission and the best KC-135 mission.The best bombing unit was achieved by the two F-111 crews of TAC's 366th TFW at Mountain Home, Idaho. These F-111s were supported in the mission by KC-135s of SAC's 916th AREFS based at Travis AFB, California. The best overall unit navigation results were posted by the B-52s and KC-135s of the 5th Bomb Wing at Minot AFB, N.D.
The crew of SAC's 380th Bomb Wing at Plattsburgh AFB, N.Y., achieved the best individual bombing results during the exercise and crew number four of the Royal Air Force's Strike Command achieved the best overall results of any of the RAF's "Vulcan" crews participating. The best '111' mission was flown by Capt. Bob Muldrow, pilot and Maj. Paul Bragdon, navigator from the 528th Bomb Squadron. Crew chiefs for the aircraft were Sgt. Randall J. Runia and Sgt. James W. Swinfort from the 380th OMS.
In the various categories of aircraft that participated in this mission, crews of the following units posted the best results in scored events:
Individual B-52 Mission. 1- 92nd Bomb Wing, Fairchild AFB, Washington. 2- 2nd Bomb Wing, Barksdale AFB, Louisiana. 3- 93rd Bomb Wing, Castle AFB, California. 4-17th Bomb Wing, Beale AFB, California. 5- 5th Bomb Wing, Minot AFB, N.D.
Individual F/FB-111 Mission. 1- 380th Bomb Wing, Plattsburgh AFB, N.Y. 2- 366th TFW, Mountain Home AFB, Idaho. 3- 366th TFW, Mountain Home AFB, Idaho. 4- 474th TFW, Nellis AFB, Nevada. 5- 509th Bomb Wing, Pease AFB, N.H.
Individual KC-135 Mission. 1- 92nd Bomb Wing, Fairchild AFB, Washington. 2- 499th Bomb Wing, Kincheloe AFB, Michigan. 3- 7th Bomb Wing, Carswell AFB, Texas. 4- 916th AREFS, Travis AFB, California. 5- 11th AREFS, Altus AFB, Oklahoma.
12-17 December 1971: Eighteenth Annual Bombing and Navigation Competition – called for the first time GIANT VOICE – was held at McCoy AFB with one aircraft and one aircrew from 54 units (22 B-52s; 30 KC-135s, two FB-111s) participating along with three RAF crews flying Vulcans. Three missions were flown covering navigation by bombers,aerial refueling by tankers, and
finally bomb release at high and low altitudes. Maj. Robert G. Hathcock, pilot, and Maj. Donald A. Itzen, navigator, flew the 380th entry. The 509th's entry was flown by LtCol Robert G. Voelker, pilot, and LtCol Billy R. Seals, navigator. Alternate crews were Maj. Robert E. Reynolds, pilot, and Maj. John R. Hudsak, navigator for the 380th BW; and Maj. Joseph Williams, pilot, and Maj. Ronald Burnett, navigator for the 509th BW.
The following photos show two aircraft from the 509th BW participating in the 1974 SAC Bomb Comp.
